In May, Democratic Senator Kamala Harris sat down with the Pod Save America guys for and laid out a somewhat jumbled four-part message on healthcare, vowing to: (1) protect Obamacare from then-active Republican repeal efforts, (2) empower government to combat prescription price gouging, (3) “look at the Cadillac Tax and deal with that,” and finally, (4) pursue a Medicare-for-All-type system.
I observed at the time that Harris’s rough-draft answer showed that there was work to be done on honing the affirmative message communicating the progressive vision for healthcare. Burying a tepid endorsement of Medicare-for-All behind Cadillac Tax repeal left much to be desired.
Harris has significantly tightened up her healthcare message. On Wednesday, she announced that she would co-sponsor Sen. Bernie Sanders’s upcoming single-payer bill. “I intend to cosponsor the Medicare for All bill,” Harris tweeted. “Health care is a right, not a privilege.”
Harris is a probable 2020 contender for the presidential nomination. While others have expressed support for single-payer, she is the first establishment Democratic to put her name on actual legislation.
This is yet another indicator that the center of gravity within the Democratic Party is swarming to the left. Harris took some flack from the left for allegedly lacking progressive bonafides. I argued that Harris and other prominent center-left Democrats are actually testaments to the left’s success in reshaping the party’s agenda. Her unequivocal embrace of single-payer now adds to that success.
She endorsed the view that healthcare is a fundamental right. This is a common rhetorical assertion among progressives. But it has the benefit of uniting the party’s supposed rift between those prioritizing economic issues and others prioritizing social and identity issues. “Healthcare is a right” presents universal coverage as an issue of both economic and social justice.
Still, there is reason to slow down the Democratic rush to sign on to single-payer healthcare. Democrats may quickly find themselves on the wrong side of the public’s deep status quo bias toward healthcare–the same fear of change that stymied Republicans’ Obamacare repeal efforts this year. The public may express support for a single-payer system as a way of voicing dissatisfaction with our current healthcare system. But when the rubber hits the road, for many people, there’s just too much at stake in healthcare to venture too far away from the system they already know.
There are always painful tradeoffs in healthcare. There are transitions that must be navigated, revenues that must be raised, and industries that must be displaced or accommodated. By putting their names to legislation, Harris and other Democrats will be taking sides in those tradeoffs. Medicare-for-All will no longer be an abstract wishful preference. It will be real dollars and cents, legislative carve-outs and burdens.
The progressive healthcare vision is coming together in refreshingly bold terms. But Harris and other Democrats need to make sure that they are prepared to stand by all that this entails.